Anti-terror proposals rejected
Closed borders, national ID cards, and increased video surveillance are some of the measures government ally Danish People’s Party say are necessary to prevent Denmark from experiencing terror attacks similar to those in London. The party, the nation’s third largest, stated their demands for increased anti-terror measures at a recent meeting with the government. The government, however, rejected the need to take further steps to prevent terror. ‘I won’t rule out that there could be some good new proposals, but the government has already followed all the recommendations of terror experts and the UN. So we’ve taken the necessary steps,’ said Helge Adam Møller, legal affairs spokesman for coalition partner the Conservatives. In addition to re-establishing border controls, implementing a national ID card, and increasing video surveillance, the People’s Party also proposed a plan to strip terror supporters of their Danish citizenship.
posted by Unknown @ 3:46 PM
8 Comments:
The anti-terrorism proposals sound like a good idea, but Islam doesn't need to rely on suicide bombers, nukes or any hardware. Its secret weapon is demographics.
Muslims are outbreeding the rest of the population in every country where they have established a foothold. It doesn't take precognitive clairvoyance to see where this is leading: it's only a matter of time before one country after another has an Islamic majority or near-majority. When that happens, forget the climb toward tolerance and civilization that has taken centuries. Get ready to welcome the Dark Ages back.
There are two responses to the Islamic breeding frenzy. One is to encourage non-Muslims to procreate like minks in heat to keep the ratio even; the second is to deport the Muslims. I favor the second alternative. Most countries in the world are already overpopulated; encouraging a breeding contest will further degrade the quality of life and put more strain on resources.
However much wishful-thinking politicians want to pretend otherwise, Muslims have a totally different value system that can no more be integrated with Western culture than oil and water can mix. The sooner this is acknowledged and Muslims are sent back to the self-created hellholes they came from, the more likely that the Western world can avoid conquest and dhimmitude.
I agree with much of what Rick Darby said here. I will add, however, that attitudes change when attacks come to home shores. Tony Blair is a case in point.
Yes, Muslims have a different value system, one which is the antithesis of Western values. I'm so tired of political correctness, the adherents of which try to pretend otherwise.
Look how hard it is to even deport those identified as "radical islamists". Teams of gov't lawyers, lots of hand wringing. 52 people dead and and many injured in the subway attacks, and 10 Islamofascists arrested. Who maybe will get deported after legal appeals.
So, does anybody know of any better systems to block these spammers from posting their idiotic links on my blog?
If the entire western world fails to address White fertility, though more pressingly within Europe itself, then all this bluster about the Muslim invasion really is a waste of everyone's time. Europe is below replacement level fertility rates. Italy, which I believe is the lowest is at a little over 1, which means for every two Italians, one child is born. Its population will be cut in half before mid century.
There was this frenzied appeal in the 70s and/or 80s to the western world to stop having so many kids due to "over-population". Now, that moronic appeal has come home to roost. The third worlders cannot be bothered with such triviality as over-population concerns. They kept breeding and now are the ones that are brought into Europe as migrant "workers". Talk about shafting the native populace TWICE!
Oh yes, another point about unwanted, uncontrolled immigration on the native populace in a welfare state, like Europe, the Americas, Australia etc. It LOWERS the fertility rate of the native population, i.e. Whites. The reason is financial. The less disposable income people have and the more it costs for basic living (and the goodies in life as well), the less inclined people are to have children. That is where they end up "saving". So mass immigration is another nail in the west's coffin.
Set up your account so there can be no live links. If the only links are in text format the desire to comment should go down. Also take the IP addresses to blogger and advise them the commenters are spamming, then post bloggers answer.
Ethnocentrist:
We cannot outbreed the Muslims in Western countries, and even if we could the unintended social and ecological consequences would be terrible.
What are you suggesting -- that we raise taxes on everyone to reward women who have six or seven babies and pay the costs of raising each of those children for 20 years? Award medals like Mussolini did to women who provided the most cannon fodder for his army?
How many people do you want in the United States -- half a billion? A billion? How many more people do you think Europe can absorb without totally wrecking the environment and quality of life?
As long as Muslims' birth rates are drastically higher than others in any given population, the only solution I can see is to kick them out and keep them out. Then in their countries of origin or refuge, they kill each other off, die of overexploitation of resources or, maybe, learn some sense when they come to understand that there is nothing to be gained and much suffering to be endured by overpopulating their own lands.
I realize how drastic this solution is, but all the alternatives seem to me far worse. Unless we remove Muslims from the West it will ultimately result in far greater carnage when the clash of civilizations devolves into civil wars.
Post a Comment
<< Home