Tuesday, August 23, 2005

Europe and Appeasement

Ali Sina comments the article "Europe, Thy Name is Cowardice". I don't think an Islamic Europe is unavoidable, yet. But war probably is. And with a few more years of this cowardice, a world war may become unavoidable, too:

A Comment on Mathis Drofner's Essay

The point that Dopfner raises is not about the past but about the present. He is saying that Europe would be committing a grave mistake if instead of fighting against Islam, she tries to appease the Islamists. Islam must be confronted forcefully and rejected completely. It is nothing but insanity to recognize a doctrine that calls you impure, idolater and even pig and orders its follower to slay you as a legitimate religion. Recognizing Islam is accepting your own death warrant. Muhammad said kill the unbelievers. You are an unbeliever. If you recognize Islam, you are agreeing to be killed. Isn't that stupid?

Muslims in Europe have gained too much power. The more Muslims become powerful the weaker Europe becomes. Europeans must realize that Islam is not just another religion in their multi cultural religious rainbow but rather is their enemy. Islam aims to destroy their culture, their democracy and take away their freedom. They must realize that Muslims are not going to integrate in their countries but rather want to swallow them. If the Europeans do not wake up soon and do not start deporting the Islamists en masse and denouncing Islam as their enemy, they will be annihilated sooner than they can think.

The threat of Islam today, is much greater than the threat of Nazism during the 1930s. Failure to address this threat will result in a war more devastating than the Second World War. Iranian communists who repeatedly betrayed Iranians, have sought refuge in the West to escape Islamic terrorism in Iran and now, true to their treacherous nature, they are supporting Islamic terrorism in Iraq and oppose the West. These people are not for peace. They want anarchy. They want mayhem and chaos. Only through disorder they hope to seize the power. The enmity of the leftists against democracy and Western values is so intense that they choose to side with Islamic terrorists and back up suicide bombings and beheading civilians to prevent democracy take root in Iraq. They are afraid of democracy like cockroaches from light. America is the bastion of democracy and the leftists can’t stand it. Europe is tilting towards the left and in her gritty antagonism to America, she is flirting with Islamism. Europe is in great danger and will pay a huge price for her support of Islam. There is only one way to describe the Europeans' appeasement of Muslims and that is “suicidal”.

8 Comments:

At August 23, 2005 10:12 PM, Blogger Jude the Obscure said...

Off topic slightly, but could anyone tell me why non-Islamists (Christians) are referred to as 'infidels'? My dictionary defines 'infidel' as 'an adherent of religion opposed to Christianity, esp. Muslim'. It is a Latin root word, not Arabic and was used by the Crusaders. Are Jews referred to as infidels as well? Why has this word been hijacked by Islamists, and why have they been let to do it?

 
At August 23, 2005 11:46 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

war tends to clear out the rubbish, and brings forth the essential defining characteristics.

But what are Europe's essential defining characteristics? Liberal democracy, or Fascism and ruthless nationalism? Post-war Europe could become more religious, and at best return to a stronger Western path alongside the USA. But the war could also exhaust Europe's remaining energy, leaving Americans and Asians to move on while Europeans descend into brutal tribalism. Could we see a revival of Eastern Europe as opposed to Western Europe? I really don't know.

China would probably laugh, yes. But on the other hand, the global economy is stil dependent upon the West. China's growth, and maybe even the country itself, could implode because of the turbulence.

 
At August 24, 2005 1:20 AM, Blogger erp said...

Question to Europeans. Do you have the stomach for the fight against the takeover of your countries by Islam? It needn't be a physical fight, but it must be fierce and must be soon.

Muslims must be forced to obey your laws or take the consequences of going to jail or being exiled.

No more nonsense of allowing Muslims to adjudicate in their own enclaves.

 
At August 24, 2005 8:09 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

These spammers are busy today.....

 
At August 24, 2005 8:37 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

DP111: Yes, I am optimistic about the outcome. Islam cannot win this. But the price will be high. First of all in the Middle East, then in Europe and India, and then everywhere else.

The USA would still be no. 1 in the post-war world. As we've discussed several times before, the interesting question is who will be no. 2, 3 or 4 ? I find this hard to predict. This struggle could invigorate Europe again, or it could break it completely, leaving the road open for Asian countries China and/or India to overtake it. China could potentially benefit from being less directly affected by the fighting than Europe, India and North America, or it could get huge internal problems in the aftermath. Russia could disintegrate.

And what will happen to non-Muslim immigrants in Europe?

 
At August 24, 2005 10:24 AM, Blogger Jude the Obscure said...

My sweeping predictions:
Post-war Europe will be more religious. Non-Muslim immigrants will have to accept the EU state religion. (Article 52 of the EU Constitution).
India will re-take control of Pakistan and Bangladesh.
China will take control of Thailand, Burma, Malaysia, Indonesia. (Good rice growing countries).
Russia will ally itself with Europe. Bosnia will disappear back into Serbia.
America will take control of Alaska, Canada, South America and Greenland. Hey - you can fight them for it!
Turkey won't get into the EU. The Muslim world will be cut loose from Asia and the West.

 
At August 24, 2005 2:18 PM, Blogger erp said...

In a variation of Golda's Meir's statement that peace in the Middle East will only come when Arabs love their children more than they hate Jews -- sanity will only return to Europe when Europeans love their children more than they fear being judgmental and politically incorrect.

It's timidity and fear of offending that's allowing the Islamic tail to wag the pacifist dog.

Time is getting short and some concerted action must taken and soon. The UK became galvanized only after dozens of their citizens were blown to bits. The Aussies have had their eyes opened and are taking strong steps to ensure their security, and even that paradise of perfect socialism, New Zealand, may be waking up.

Will it take bombs in Oslo or Paris before Europeans are similarly shaken out of their stupor?

 
At August 24, 2005 4:19 PM, Blogger Rick Darby said...

The best scenario I can envision is that the next Islamist-planned terror attack is deadly and spectacular but not catastrophic. Perhaps a few thousand more deaths and the destruction of some beloved building or monument.

Why is such a dreadful prospect "best"? Because it is the only event I can foresee that will (a) snap Europe and the few corrigible minds among the worldwide left out of the coma induced by thirty years of political correctness and multi-culti indoctrination; and (b) still leave enough people, strength and intact governmental structure to declare war on the enemy, beginning by deportation of first- and second-generation Muslim immigrants.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home