Friday, July 22, 2005

Man linked to London bombings threatens Sweden

This is not the first time Sweden receives terror threats. The man is perfectly right when he says that the London bombers "are not terrorists, as they are doing what Islam requires”: Jihad against the infidels:

Man linked to London bombings threatens Sweden

The 39-year old Swede suspected of involvement in the London bombings has said that Sweden would be “punished” if he was handed over to a foreign power. The man, who is originally from Lebanon, has lived in Sweden since he was 18. In an interview with Dagens Nyheter last October, he denied that he had met Osama Bin Laden but said that he “loved him”. “I am proud of Osama bin Laden. I am proud of everyone who wages war for justice.” The man also told Dagens Nyheter that he thought the September 11th attacks against the United States were “very good.” The man refuted accusations that he had been at a terrorist training camp in Oregon in 1999. He admitted, however, that he had lived with Abu Hamza, a controversial Muslim preacher at the Finsbury Park mosque in London, who is currently awaiting trial in Britain on terrorism and race-hate charges. The Swedish man says that he lived with one-eyed, hook-handed Hamza “for medical reasons, as a nurse.” While denying involvement in the London bombings, the man said that the suicide bombers who attacked three underground trains and a bus were “martyrs,” adding that he hoped also to become a martyr one day. “They are not terrorists, as they are doing what Islam requires,” he said. Sweden, he said, is not threatened by al-Qaeda, although he told Expressen that this could change if the Swedish government handed him over to the British or American authorities. “If Sweden hands me over to another country then it will only have itself to blame. Sweden will then be punished with the greatest punishment.”


At July 22, 2005 6:55 PM, Blogger Smokey said...

if islam requires the murder of hundreds of innocent people, then fuck islam, fuck them all, if they keep going on like this, they will receive a nice big nuke on their heads, and that'll be the end of it.

At July 22, 2005 7:56 PM, Blogger Freerider said...

Knowing Sweden, they will cower to this one man's demands.

They will probably release him because they are too afraid.

Today is another day which I am ashamed to be a Swede.

At July 22, 2005 9:25 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

Smokey: I hope it will never get that far. But the day Jihadis get their hands on nukes, they will probably use it........

At July 23, 2005 12:40 AM, Blogger PD111 said...

Fjordman and friends

As you know, I have posted much about islam in the last 4 years. The evil of Islam is now out of the bag. Major papers such as the DT and the Times of London are questioning the precepts of islam. Even the Independent of Britain is doing so. We the bloggers, unveiled islam. Time to move on, for indeed we have to, as this continued low level attacks are causing immense damage to our free societies. Our civilisation is dying right at this moment, as freedoms we have taken for granted, are slowly being strangled in the name of security. So it is imperative that bloggers start to discuss where we go from here?

There are many who would wish the West to make a response to the Jihad that is being conducted against us. Its purpose as you well know, is to shock and terrorise so that we give in to the demands of "moderate" muslim spokesmen who come immediately after a terrorist attack and thus start the process of dhimmification.

The question is how do we carry the war to an enemy whose ideology we recognise as a religion, while ours is multi-culturalism. You see the difficulty here. There is no way we can conduct a war both physical, and more importantly ideological, as long as we subscribe to either one of those two tenets. Even if we discard multi-culturalism, this in itself is not sufficient. This inevitably leads us to ask, can we somehow re-define Islam, in particular for a Western audience, not as a religion but as a political ideology, and one whose tenets are sufficiently evil, so that it merits destruction, much as Nazism. (Note here that I do not recognise that islam is susceptible to reformation). This construct has to take place so that the Western populace sees it as justifiable to actually give the physical and moral support that is required for such a large undertaking. (In passing it is worth noting the political difficulty that Bush and Blair are having in Iraq in sustaining political support for the war, once they had proclaimed that Islam is a RoP - they had conceded the moral ground). They now have the same problem here in the West, as the bombs go of.

The jihadis have a clear moral purpose, and we have to need to define an even more powerful moral argument, as to why our cause is more just, more moral and better - not just to our public, whose unwavering support we need, but to many muslims around the world. Once we have such a clear moral purpose, then indeed we can go to full scale war, and even respond to a nuclear attack in an appropriate fashion without being fatally afflicted by guilt that is part and part and parcel of the Judeao-Christian civilisation.

What is the magic formula that will mobilise us, give us a clear moral superiority that will sustain us through thick and thin?


At July 23, 2005 1:30 AM, Blogger PD111 said...


I did not notice that you had collected the posts from LGF. I'm very grateful. Many thanks.

Apologies for wasting your bandwidth. There are a few extra bits on thiss post but they are not significant. Delete the post on this thread when you get around to it.

I really do appreciate the time and effort you are putting in, but really, we do not have a choice. This war is barbarism waging war on civilisation. We did not ask it or cause it. It is part of the Jihad. History does not always favour civilisation, as your comments most succinctly point out.

Someday we have to get together for a boozeup, though I may not be able to afford the rounds after four, considering the cost of drinks in Norway.

At July 23, 2005 1:38 AM, Blogger nouille said...

Send him back to Lebanon.

Unfortunately Sweden will have to hear Europe(France, Germany, Spain) complain about how unjust you have been if you do.

eye of Oden: don't be ashamed, it could be worse, you could be an American. We are sooo loved these days. ;)


Post a Comment

<< Home