Wednesday, April 20, 2005

Evangelist Preacher Calls Muhammad a "Pedophile"

A Norwegian Christian evangelist preacher living in Sweden, perhaps most known for his marriage to Swedish local celebrity singer Carola, has now been hanged out in the tabloid Aftonbladet, for his on tape for sale comments about Muhammad. All headlines screamed:

“Runar goes to attack against Islam. -Muhammad was a confused pedophile.”

[...]"Statement about Mohamed has put the country’s Muslims in rage.
Hundreds of furious Muslims yesterday called Aftonbladet –many with direct murder threats aimed towards Runar Sögaard. -We all know what happened with Pim Fortuyn in the Netherlands. This will Runar regret says a 33 year old Muslim in Örebro county.[...]


At April 20, 2005 3:28 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ballsy guy. And obviously, sickeningly, they're already preparing to look they other way when something happens to him. "He was a free speech fundamentalist on a martyr mission, just like Van Gogh," they'll say. Or, "He was a Christian bigot who incited hatred. The Muslims HAD to defend themselves."

At April 20, 2005 4:47 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

What else do you call a man who has sex with a nine year old girl?
And why aren't those Muslims threatening to murder this man arrested and imprisoned, or deported? It's illegal in the US to threaten someone's life, but not overseas? I still don't understand why the Dutch politicians live in fear, while those threatening them walk around unimpeded (I'm assuming there is some way to track these animals down with decent police work. Treehugger

At April 20, 2005 7:32 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

In some countries you can´t produce a murder case without the body or without the weapon used for the murder, or atleast it used to be like that.

Now it appears you can plan murder and even genocide as crazy as you like, until you done it and proven guilty you are innocent.
Drawing of a nuclear plant and other buildings, bombmaking material apparently doesn´t count at all, and using wiretaps etc. as evidence probably of no value either.

So we probably have to wait till some 1000´s died before the courts find reason to retain anybody, after all you would not put an innocent in jail now would you ?

Thomas Bolding Hansen.

At April 20, 2005 8:32 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This will Runar regret says a 33 year old Muslim in Örebro county.

So the threats of murder are already coming in.

And what is wrong with naming mohammed as a paedophile? Name and shame is the way to go.

Since when did it become a crime to speak the truth? Oh I remember, since we allowed muslims into the West, desperate as we were that the social security allottment was not being taken up in full.

Mohammed was not just a paedophile but a demented sociopath of the worst kind.

Ali Sena has this to say, "Muhammad's butchery of his victims on the other hand, was psychopathological. He would massacre entire populations simply because they rejected him or hurt his humongous narcissistic ego".


At April 20, 2005 8:44 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Treehugger posted: And why aren't those Muslims threatening to murder this man arrested and imprisoned, or deported?

Fear. The Swedes are terrified out of their minds. In addition they would rather die then abandon their multi-cultural ideas that all cultures are the same.

There is no point in legally trying these islamofascists and then sending them to jail. They like that, as draining the kaffir economy is "good jihad". They will do anything to stay in the West. In the UK, islamofascists would rather stay in jail then walk free in their beloved islamic country. Deportation without benefit of trial, should be the answer - not just of these islamofascists but their families as well.

We can do this if we stop pretending that the Jihad is a law and order problem, which it is not. It is war, and has to be dealt with in the same manner.


At April 20, 2005 9:12 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

As an afterthought, may I recommend a post on LGF on Pope Benedict XVI, by someone who knew him.

Well worth a read.


At April 20, 2005 9:25 PM, Blogger erp said...

Why are they so upset? Doesn't their holy book say the marriage was consummated when the bride was 9 years old? Why not just explain that nine is the age of consent and let it go at that.

When I was in France walking with my 11 years old granddaughter, I was quite uncomfortable by Arabs young and old leering at her. This doesn't happen here in the US, at least not yet. Unsettling and disgusting.

At April 21, 2005 1:24 AM, Blogger Don Miguel said...

The truth hurts.

At April 21, 2005 5:57 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The prophet married Aisha when she was six, but didn't consumate until she was nine. So let's be nice multiculturalists and praise Mohammed for restraining his creepy desires for three whole years.

I have to go practice bowing to Mecca now.

At April 21, 2005 7:02 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Time to accept, that Islam is no "religion", but deserves to be considered something like the Nazi SS or SA, a totalitarian ideology which demands total obedience by everyone -- believers or not -- and it is only a question if they have the muscle to force the non-believers down on their knees.
And Muhammed was a pedophile, but not "confused". His third wife (of 13, plus many concubines and sex-slaves) was Alyshia, who married him when she was 7 years old (he was 50). "But", as the Muslim apologists say, he did not consummate the marriage for two years. That hardly cuts it. Islam is, in fact, overflooded with pedophiles, and Theo Van Gogh did not abusively use the term "goat f***ers" for nothing. Anything goes, except standard monogamous heterosexualty.
(Avoiding Jihad murder, will remain anonymous)

At April 21, 2005 7:52 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Common sense dictates that the offended PoP (Prophet of Paedophylia) defenders can be counted among the worst anthropomorphic scumbags.

At April 22, 2005 12:15 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Scandinavians (Swedish newspaper Expressen):

Hassan Moussa: "Runar wants to create e new Holland" and "There is no room for this kind of behavior in a civilized society" [i.e. not pedophilia but critic of the pedophile].

The same Hassan Moussa in May 2004:

"Dubbla budskap i moskén"

At April 22, 2005 6:58 PM, Blogger Jude the Obscure said...

Has anyone gone to Part 3, page 13? Do it now.

At April 22, 2005 7:47 PM, Blogger Don Miguel said...

How about a link?

At April 22, 2005 9:59 PM, Blogger Jude the Obscure said...

I am almost a technological illiterate - I would give a link if I knew how to do it. As it is, I basically stumble onto things and this one was most interesting. Have a look.

At April 23, 2005 12:36 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

jude the obscure:
I looked on for something called part 3 but found nothing. Can you please be more precise?


At April 23, 2005 1:15 AM, Blogger Jude the Obscure said...

Full address: is what I go to.
Can you tell me how I can link it?

At April 23, 2005 10:58 AM, Blogger Andjam said...

Congrats on your blog!

I watched a program last Monday on Isioma Daniel (the Nigerian journalist who said that Mohammed would have chosen one of the Miss World contestants to be her wife and is now living in Norway, and who has a blog here ).

Now this.

Sadly, some Australian viewers of the show sided against Isioma (check some of the comments in previous pages of this)

At April 24, 2005 7:23 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Everybody know the facts about the
age of girl in question, whats
the point in the preacher repeating
it ?
Muslims know the fact but choose
to be muslims (obviously), non
muslims know the facts but choose
to be non-muslims.
Whats the point in stirring up
trouble ?


Post a Comment

<< Home