Friday, November 18, 2005

Rape in Sweden - and its perpetrators

Bjørn Stærk claimed that my posts about rapes in Sweden were exaggerated. Well, I'm not so sure. Now official figures from Sweden show that almost half of all rapists are immigrants. And I'm not talking about Koreans. As Steen from Danske øjne på svenske forhold points out, largely Muslim immigrants are behind about 70% of all rape charges in Denmark, and in the Oslo region in Norway. Sweden has a much larger immigrant population, both relative and actual, than either of its neighbors. There is little reason to expect the percentage of immigrants to be any lower in Sweden. The actual number is thus probably even higher than what the authorities are reporting now. From Viking Observer:


Rape in Sweden - and its perpetrators

According to a not yet published study from the Crime Prevention Council, Brå, men with a foreign background are over-represented in the group of suspected rapists. It is approximately four times more common that a known offender is born abroad, compared to persons born in Sweden. It has looked like that for a long time, according to Peter Martens, statistician for Brå. He points out that the talk is about identified offenders. That they have been identified does not mean they have been convicted. The lates study came in 1996, and showed that resident aliens from Algeria, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia dominate the group of suspected men. The pattern in the new study is the same.


From Swedish blogger Simulev:


Plauge of assault gangrapes in Sweden


After weeks of preparations in the press about the new phenomenon of the brutal outdoor gang assault rapes that has plagued and haunted Sweden, finally politically correct Aftonbladet that has suppressed facts for months, no years, (meaning suppressing the rapists origins, unless of course they have been ethnical Swedish) about the sexual predators, takes the lid off the can of worms. Almost half of all perpetrators are immigrants.

12 Comments:

At November 18, 2005 2:35 AM, Blogger justmom said...

Wikipedia identifies 'Aftonbladet' as the largest daily newspaper in Scandinavia.

It appears that Fjordman's tireless efforts to expose this tragic injustice is finally gaining momentum with the msm. Awesome.

 
At November 18, 2005 4:37 AM, Blogger reliapundit said...

the truth wins.

and it's time that europe faced up to the truth.

it's time for harsh measures.

without them, europe will devolve into... euarabia.

it has happened before in many places, countries.

before arafat established arafatistan, bethlehem used to be 25% christian. they all left.

ditto beirut.

they are attempting the same in moros and souith thailand in bangladesh in afghanistan and in iraq and egypt and jordan and algeria and chechnya and kososvo etc.

so of course they are attempting it in europe.

muslims are attacking christians all over the world.

when they aren't killing christians they're killing shias.

they will win if you donpt fight back.

 
At November 18, 2005 5:51 AM, Blogger simulev said...

Fjordman, How sick is this on a scale?
Raped -By new HIV man

-The predator is a foreign embassy employed.
-Who has HIV
- At his home with friends gang rapes a Swedish victim.
-Photographs the victim during the rape.
-Then claim he tried to "help" the victim.

Bet 10 to 1 defense goes for diplomatic immunity.

 
At November 18, 2005 8:36 AM, Blogger Cosmophant said...

Swedish Metro spins it the other way around:

http://www.metro.se/content/acrobat/riks/SERIK_20051116_A_Metro.pdf
(Metro November 16-18, metro.se)

The typical rapist is Swedish, says Metro. However, they admit that in Malmö immigrants "seem" to be overrepresented. (this since all 10 rape verdicts studied in Malmö involved foreign citizens). Among all the 98 verdicts studied, 42% involved foreign citizens.

But keep in mind that the majority of "immigrants" already have Swedish citizenship. We should also keep in mind that rape verdicts are not the same things as reported rapes, or actual rapes.

Also note the difference compared to Aftonbladet's "In half of the convicted cases he has at least one foreign-born parent" (a definition that does not take citizenship in consideration at all).

It is a bureacratic jungle all these concepts, and can easily be used to spin and blur the description. And so it has been more often than not.

Why not make a study based on religion? In Aftonbladet criminology professor Jerzy Sarnecki claims that "Cultural differences and religion as explaination for rapes is nonsense". How can he claim that, when such a study never has been made? Why not make such a study? I would like to see to what degree Muslims are overrepresented in rapes. I do not care much about people's citizenship or in what country their parents were born.

 
At November 18, 2005 8:55 AM, Blogger Theresa said...

Fjordman -

Did you see this story? >>

"Innvandrermenn banker opp kona oftere"

http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/iriks/article1151443.ece

 
At November 18, 2005 9:25 AM, Blogger Esther said...

I think the issue with Muslim rapists is not only the rapes themselves but mainly the indentity of the victims.

On the other hand, if the discussion is about rape and Islam the question should not be "what is the percentage of (Muslim) immigrants in the statistics?", but rather "what is the percentage of rapes among Muslim immigrants as compared to immigrants elsewhere and from other backgrounds?"

 
At November 18, 2005 3:19 PM, Blogger Cosmophant said...

Quite right, Esther. And the answer would be that it is a matter of a tiny minority, but also that it's many times (a magnitude) larger than the tiny minority of the Westerners doing it.

This is why the matter should interest also people, such as Bjoern Staerk and Oyvind, who stress that Islamists are only a tiny minority of Muslims. So what is the relation really between these two tiny minorities? And it is enough to claim that such a tiny minority is proportional to the number of Muslims in total (the soil from which they grow out), to be able to claim that the demographic trends, and the growing percentage of Muslims in a country is a problematic issue.

When it comes to gang rapes, someone pointed out to me that, before in history, these have only been happening in the brutality of a situation of war, and what we see today is a stark change from that pattern. I rather think not. In a radical Islamist mind, the West is Dar-al-Harb, and they are in total war with us. So, considering this, their brutally gang raping our daughters is not a surprise really at all.

People such as Bjoern and Oyvind claim that they fully understand that the Islamist are in total war with us, but still they are in denial about the role of (gang)rapes in this. I do think they are aware that this is a war, but that they are yet unable to fully take in what a (good old) war really means. This, of course, they share with the vast majority of Westerners, including most neocons. It's all a shocking reality, and it will take quite a bit of more time for most people before it sinks in (unless it hits them in the head first).

In the old days, people would have reacted much earlier to these things, but today such a reaction is considered to be evil since it's unsophisticated. The West has fostred a whole generation of snobs, living in an unbelievably protected environment, disconnected from previous human history.

That's how it is. Snobs'r'us. But not much longer...

Capitalism is indeed wonderful. No other system would make it possible for all people of a society living as aristocrats -- and all of them living better than any aristocracy ever before in history. So, talk about opium of the people! Capitalism is wonderful, but as all things magically good, in can also be heavily abused as a drug. And Westerners today are completely opium drenched.

So this is the context we start from when meeting the future "challenges". As I see it the "opium" is the problematic part here. Islamic holy war shouldn't be that tough a task to deal with, once we set our minds on actually doing it.

 
At November 18, 2005 6:43 PM, Blogger Don Miguel said...

simulev:

If the perpetrator actually has diplomatic immunity there will be no defense because there will be no trial -- he cannot be prosecuted. Of course Sweden could raise hell with his government and get them to waive diplomatic immunity.

And even if he does get tried and convicted, what will he get in Sweden? 1 or 2 years in a nice jail?

 
At November 18, 2005 9:44 PM, Blogger José María said...

You Scandinavians are really sick.

Only 15 years for a murder!

Do you love each other? I don´t mean sex, I mean "love" if you can imagine what that is (I doubt it).

What a degenerate countries!

 
At November 19, 2005 7:16 AM, Blogger simulev said...

Cosmophant, thanks for the tips. See
http://simulev.blogspot.com/2005/11/rape-jihad-in-sweden.html

 
At November 19, 2005 2:57 PM, Blogger Cosmophant said...

Simulev,

I'm glad you found my input useful.

 
At November 19, 2005 7:54 PM, Blogger Esther said...

Jmaria:

Maybe somebody can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that's an average sentence for murder in Northern Europe.

What I would like to know is whether this asylum seeker would be sent back to Somalia once he finishes his sentence.

http://islamineurope.blogspot.com/2005/11/case-for-asylum-seekers.html

 

Post a Comment

<< Home